How to check an AI-written procedure before staff use it

The draft will read well. That's the danger. A tool's maker warns that a confident tone isn't proof, since wrong answers can be delivered with high confidence.1 A smooth step can still be wrong.
Step by step
- Read it with the job in front of you. Stand where the work happens. Compare every line with what you do, in order.
- Mark each step: right, wrong or guessed. If you can't say which, it's guessed. Treat guessed as wrong until proved.
- Look for invented detail. Tools can produce fabricated references to documents that don't exist.1 Check any form name, law, code or standard the page mentions. Does it exist, and does it say that?
- Check names and settings. Buttons, menu paths, product names, room names. These change, and the tool can't see yours.
- Look for what's missing. A checklist exists so that no step is left out of a procedure.2 Ask the person who does the job every day: "What do you do that isn't on here?"
- Look for what shouldn't be there. A checklist should include only necessary checks.2 Cut anything padded in to look thorough.
- Check the order. Swapped steps change the job. Closing the till before counting the cash is a different job from counting first.
- Check warnings. If the job has a hazard, the page should say so. Safety content needs an official source, not just your read. See safety and legal steps.
Compare with an outside source
Where a step rests on a maker's manual, a regulator or your own insurer's rules, open that source and read the matching part. The tool's maker says to verify technical information and references to external documents.1 Don't rely on the same tool to confirm its own work.
The UK's National Cyber Security Centre notes that such answers can sound convincing yet be only partly correct.3 Partly correct is the hardest kind to spot, because most of the page looks fine.
Test it on a newcomer
Hand the page to someone who's never done the job. Watch. Don't help.
- Where do they stop?
- What do they ask?
- What do they do differently from the page?
- Do they finish with the right result?
Every stall points at a missing or unclear step. Fix those, then run it again with someone else if you can.
Sign it off
- A named person approves the page. Not "the team".
- A date goes on it, with the next review date.
- A note records what was checked and against what, such as "checked against the supplier's manual".
- A way to report problems stays open. Staff who find a wrong step should know who to tell.
Procedures need improving as conditions or equipment change.4 Put a review in the diary now rather than when something breaks.
When to stop and ask an expert
- The step involves electrical work, gas, chemicals, heights or heavy lifting.
- The step involves the law, tax, privacy or employment.
- Two sources disagree.
- You can't find a source at all.
In those cases, the page waits until an official source or a qualified person has been through it.
Reference list
- Does ChatGPT tell the truth?, OpenAI Help Center
- Checklist, Wikipedia
- ChatGPT and large language models: what's the risk?, National Cyber Security Centre (UK)
- Safe work procedure, Wikipedia


